Small Glitter Eyeshadow She Sparkles dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·Mauve · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: medium mauve w/ pink micro glitter
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: burgundy metallic with taupe shimmer/copper rose foil with shifts of pink and gold sparkle
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (31%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than mauve· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than mauve · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: light purple with gold glitter
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Golden rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: brushed gold with silver shimmer
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Might Mauve, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in She Sparkles. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeShe SparklesClosest matchMight MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%69#a28988#b09298Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85MediumMediumSameDepth difference 5.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall78
Longevity50%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.