Small Glitter Eyeshadow Slow Fast Slow dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·Red · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Terracotta rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Terracotta rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than red· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Terracotta rather than red · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than red· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than red · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: deep champagne with silver flecks
Differences: Rose rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Plum rather than red· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Plum rather than red · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: bronzed plum with a hint of violet
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than red· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Copper rather than red · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than red· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than red · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than red· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than red · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than red
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than red
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than red· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than red · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Morphe ChromaPlus 6-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Tailored Nudes, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Slow Fast Slow. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSlow Fast SlowClosest matchTailored NudesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#b76554#c16553Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared19
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 65/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $10 more
Sephora
Walmart
