Small Glitter Eyeshadow Last Dance dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·Rose · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (77%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Peach Mochi, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Last Dance. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLast DanceClosest shade matchPeach MochiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#e3a39b#e0a7a0Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Pillow Talk, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Last Dance. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLast DanceClosest overall alternativePillow TalkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%93#e3a39b#dd9c94Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 83/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$22 less (85%)
