Small Glitter Eyeshadow Pink Lightning dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·Pink · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (73%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic mid-tone pink with gold flecks
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: warm nudie pink with rainbow sparkle
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling flamingo pink with an opalescent shift
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than pink· Dewy rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
37
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than pink · Dewy rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering soft mauve with hidden pearl
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in PINK MIRAGE, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Pink Lightning. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink LightningClosest matchPINK MIRAGEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%57#ae556e#b46487Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%82Deep / darkMediumSome differenceDepth difference 6.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (73%)
