Small Glitter Eyeshadow Let's Roll dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·Mauve · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.50 less (60%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (73%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: metallic mid-tone pink with gold flecks
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than mauve· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: warm nudie pink with rainbow sparkle
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (23%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Golden rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: bright rose‑gold shade with soft-pink & a shimmer finish
RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Mallo Coast, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Let's Roll. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLet's RollClosest shade matchMallo CoastHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#c86d64#bf655eVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared7
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Longevity50%8012-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Overall match 62/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Take Your Pink, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Let's Roll. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLet's RollClosest overall alternativeTake Your PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%75#c86d64#c27a6dClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared86
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Same price
Sephora
