Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 009 dupes and alternatives Milani
4.3 (1,381)·Medium · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: LIGHT TO MEDIUM WITH WARM UNDERTONES
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: LIGHT TO MEDIUM WITH NEUTRAL UNDERTONES
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral beige undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 12-hour wear· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: light medium, neutral to cool
The closest shade to Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 009 (Medium · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Medium Dark 147W, against Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 009. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade009Closest matchMedium Dark 147WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%96#bf9574#bd9572Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionLight mediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 97/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $53.51 more
Sephora
