Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 014 dupes and alternatives Milani
4.3 (1,381)·Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Golden Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: tan skin with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.49 less (51%)4.3 (644)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.99 less (22%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium-deep shade, golden undertone
$14.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.99 less (22%)4.5 (995)
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium-Dark shade with neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 014 (Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 6, against Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 014. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade014Closest shade match6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%85#8e684a#966c46Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Skin Silk Serum Foundation in F14.9NC, against Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 014. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade014Closest overall alternativeF14.9NCHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%93#8e684a#916643Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.