Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 025 dupes and alternatives Milani
4.3 (1,381)·Rich deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$0.50 less (3%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains drying alcohol
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.49 less (57%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims 8-hour wear
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral, rich-brown undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims 32-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 025 (Rich deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 17.5, against Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 025. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade025Closest match17.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%96#483224#462f22Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.