Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 016 dupes and alternatives Milani
4.3 (1,381)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$3.49 less (19%)3.9 (223)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: dark brown skin w/golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: TAN WITH NEUTRAL OLIVE UNDERTONES
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick 016 (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 14.5N Redondo, against Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 016. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade016Closest shade match14.5N RedondoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#8a6340#8a6747Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeep tanCloseDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionDeep tanDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in 300 Neutral, against Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 016. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade016Closest overall alternative300 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#8a6340#865c2eClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 3.7
Retailer descriptionDeep tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $53.51 more
