Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush Candy Apple dupes and alternatives rhode
4.2 (2,191)·Red · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than red· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than red · Powder rather than balm (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than red · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than red· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than red · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than red · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than red· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than red · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than red· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
47
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than red · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than red · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
94
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Watermelon Bliss, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Candy Apple. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCandy AppleClosest shade matchWatermelon BlissHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour55%63#e53d62#db4650Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall47
Finish50%47ShimmerNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%30BalmPowderDifferentPowder rather than balm
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Intense Guava, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Candy Apple. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCandy AppleClosest overall alternativeIntense GuavaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour55%88#e53d62#ee2a66Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 78/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $9 more
Ulta Beauty
