Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than balm (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than pink· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than balm (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Liquid rather than balm (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush Longwear Natural Glow Cream Blush in 44 Nude Lavalliere, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Teacup. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTeacupClosest match44 Nude LavalliereHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#cc7083#cb7782Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 95/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
Ulta Beauty
