Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Other rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Other rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Powder rather than balm (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Powder rather than balm (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than terracotta· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than terracotta · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than terracotta· Gel rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than terracotta · Gel rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Summer Fridays Blush Butter Balm Hydrating Cream Blush with Peptides in Toasted Terracotta - warm rose, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Toasted Teddy - bronze terracotta. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 88/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.