Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Brown / nude rather than peach· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown / nude rather than peach · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Liquid rather than balm (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than peach· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than peach · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Powder rather than balm (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Powder rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than peach· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than peach · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Ogee Sculpted Cream Blush Stick in Topaz, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Freckle - neutral peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFreckle - neutral peachClosest matchTopazHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%85#d57d72#ce7b69Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%67SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%85BalmCreamCloseCream rather than balm
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 88/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.