Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than mauve· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Amour – 901, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Sleepy Girl - soft mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 80/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in She's Blushing, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Sleepy Girl - soft mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 87/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.