Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush Date Cake - warm red berry dupes and alternatives rhode
4.2 (2,191)·Berry · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than berry· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than berry · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than berry· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than berry · Powder rather than balm (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: satin· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than berry· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than berry · Powder rather than balm (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than berry· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than berry · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry· Gel rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Gel rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than berry · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than balm (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim hydration· Same skin types: normal, dry, combination
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format)
→Strawberry Latte - Strawberry Fizz, Rose Chai, Latte, Pink Espresso
67
overall
Shade match81
$45SephoraCosts $20 more4.6 (1,018)
Matte · Sheer
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
57
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a delicious blend of creamy mauve, warm rose, and rich espresso tones
Maybelline Fit Me Blush in Berry, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Date Cake - warm red berry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDate Cake - warm red berryClosest shade matchBerryHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour55%78#af5f65#b25757Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%—not comparableBalmNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 75/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Radiant Talc-Free Baked Powder Blush in Ma Donna, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Date Cake - warm red berry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDate Cake - warm red berryClosest overall alternativeMa DonnaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour55%97#af5f65#b15c63Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 78/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
CVS
SephoraCosts $5 more
Ulta Beauty
