Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than balm (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than balm (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than balm (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than balm (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Summer Fridays Blush Butter Balm Hydrating Cream Blush with Peptides in Sweet Rosé - cool baby pink, against rhode Pocket Blush Buildable Hydrating Cream Blush in Sprinkle - warm pearly pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 92/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $4 more
