Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than plum · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Rebel, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Berry Currant 301. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry Currant 301Closest matchRebelHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall90
Colour60%85#841a4c#7e1b41Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall88
Finish55%78SatinCreamCloseCream finish rather than satin
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 83/100Shade match 90/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
