Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Cream rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Cream · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Cream rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than berry · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Plum rather than berry· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than berry· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than berry · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
4
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than berry · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than berry · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than berry · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Westman Atelier HydroBalm Sheer Tinted Lipstick with Peptides and Hyaluronic Acid in Onyx, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Raisin 318. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRaisin 318Closest shade matchOnyxHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%94#773154#793050Very close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 77/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NYX Professional Makeup Shine Loud High Shine Long-Lasting Liquid Lipstick in In Charge, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Raisin 318. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRaisin 318Closest overall alternativeIn ChargeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall83
Colour60%72#773154#87284eClose colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $1 more
