Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Cream · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Cream rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Cream rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Cream
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Cream rather than shimmer (finish) · 18-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Valentino Spike Valentino Buttery Matte Lipstick in 135A- Better Crying In A Limo, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Cappuccino 302. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCappuccino 302Closest shade match135A- Better Crying In A LimoHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall83
Colour60%73#b57258#c6735eClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall16
Finish55%4ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Not listed10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 62/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NYX Professional Makeup Shine Loud High Shine Long-Lasting Liquid Lipstick in Goal Crusher, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Cappuccino 302. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCappuccino 302Closest overall alternativeGoal CrusherHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall76
Colour60%86#b57258#bc6e58Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 75/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $1 more
