Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Huda Beauty Liquid Matte Mousse Soft Blur Lip Cream in Bombshell Pinky Brown, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Toasted Almond 383. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToasted Almond 383Closest shade matchBombshell Pinky BrownHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%81#aa7164#af6a62Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared4
Finish55%4ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Longevity60%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 65/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick in Gem Stone, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Toasted Almond 383. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToasted Almond 383Closest overall alternativeGem StoneHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall84
Colour60%75#aa7164#a36964Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Longevity60%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $0.49 more
