Luxe Satin Lipstick Valley Girl 325 dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (810)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Grapefruit Pucker, against Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Valley Girl 325. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeValley Girl 325Closest matchGrapefruit PuckerHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%81#f27b95#fe738aClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100SatinSatinSameSame satin finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 84/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.