Naked Eyeshadow Stick Blurred Out dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (1,756)·Nude · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Cold Brew, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Blurred Out. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlurred OutClosest shade matchCold BrewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%94#ba9080#bc907cVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall22
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 69/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Oyster Twilight, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Blurred Out. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlurred OutClosest overall alternativeOyster TwilightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#ba9080#c29183Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Finish65%75MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $9 more
