Naked Eyeshadow Stick Top Off dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (1,756)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver and copper pearls
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than golden· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than golden · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Winky Lux Rose Petal Liquid Eyeshadow in Magnolia Shimmer, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Top Off. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTop OffClosest matchMagnolia ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#f2dbd0#f3ddd3Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 92/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (28%)
Sephora
