Naked Eyeshadow Stick Tasteful dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (1,756)·Brown · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Claims comfort
Differences: 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than brown· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than brown · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Metallic
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Café Noir, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Tasteful. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTastefulClosest shade matchCafé NoirHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#715b51#765c53Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall41
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay 24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow in Diamond Dog, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Tasteful. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTastefulClosest overall alternativeDiamond DogHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#715b51#6d554dVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Overall match 85/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.