Naked Eyeshadow Stick Toasty dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (1,756)·Bronze · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than bronze· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than bronze · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than bronze· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than bronze · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than bronze· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than bronze · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than bronze· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than bronze · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peachy beige with champagne sparkle
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Wanderlust Glitter, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Toasty. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToastyClosest shade matchWanderlust GlitterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%99#cbaa96#cba995Looks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Ghosted, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Toasty. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeToastyClosest overall alternativeGhostedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%90#cbaa96#d3b19fVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 88/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
