Naked Eyeshadow Stick Peach Bum dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.7 (1,756)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver and copper pearls
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Roxy, against Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Peach Bum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeach BumClosest matchRoxyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#efccbd#e7ccc4Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $8 more
