Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Amber Haze dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Golden · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep bronze with golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Copper rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool tan/beige shade with a matte finish
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (19%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Metallic rather than satin (finish)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Metallic rather than satin (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (19%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Metallic rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Metallic rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (38%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (28%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same warm undertone
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than golden · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Ample Amber, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Amber Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmber HazeClosest shade matchAmple AmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%79#a96740#9f6041Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared43
Finish65%30SatinMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall30
Longevity50%2024-hour wear8-hour wearDifferent8-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall24
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%0Normal, Dry, OilySensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 65/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Warm Wishes Effortless Bronzer Stick in Always Sunny, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Amber Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmber HazeClosest overall alternativeAlways SunnyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%77#a96740#b66f4bClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 5.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish65%88SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 82/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora
Walmart$23.02 less (72%)
