Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Ballet Quartz dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: dusty-pink with rose-gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rosy-pink with subtle shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Rosewater, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Ballet Quartz. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBallet QuartzClosest shade matchRosewaterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#e38d94#de868dVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightMediumCloseDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L.A. Girl Prism Stick Eye & Face Jelly Stick in Tease, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Ballet Quartz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBallet QuartzClosest overall alternativeTeaseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#e38d94#d68f98Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared60
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.