Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Cashmere Sculpt dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Nude · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (19%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a greyish taupe with a hint of shimmer.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than nude· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Painterly, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Cashmere Sculpt. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCashmere SculptClosest shade matchPainterlyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#d1a093#d4a292Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Finish65%75SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Au Naturel, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Cashmere Sculpt. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCashmere SculptClosest overall alternativeAu NaturelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%86#d1a093#c9a295Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
