Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Satin Diamonds dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (19%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne gold that reflects pink
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$26 less (81%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Green rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Green rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: bright gold to pinky copper to metallic olive multichrome finish
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Cream & Sugar, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Satin Diamonds. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSatin DiamondsClosest shade matchCream & SugarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#f8ba9c#eab89dVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Sip & Sparkle, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Satin Diamonds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSatin DiamondsClosest overall alternativeSip & SparkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%72#f8ba9c#eabeaaClose colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$6 less (19%)
