Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Nude Sculpt dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Nude · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (19%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (72%)4.2 (2,863)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Metallic rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Metallic rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
34
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (47%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: bonne chance/khaki green, bisou/golden peach, frappé/mink brown
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Green rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Rosy, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Nude Sculpt. Matched on the Lucent pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude SculptClosest shade matchRosyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#dcb3aa#d7aea7Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared43
Finish65%45SatinShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 18M Beige, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Nude Sculpt. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude SculptClosest overall alternative18M BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%80#dcb3aa#e9bbabClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Finish65%75SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$21.50 less (67%)
