Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Astral Topaz dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Bronze · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (22%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: medium brown with cool undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (63%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (47%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same warm undertone
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rich, deep cocoa-brown shade with a matte finish
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (56%)4.4 (1,922)
Matte
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than bronze · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Metallic rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Metallic rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Sartorial, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Astral Topaz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAstral TopazClosest shade matchSartorialHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#7c513d#7a523eLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared53
Finish65%45SatinShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Warm Wishes Effortless Bronzer Stick in On the Horizon, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Astral Topaz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAstral TopazClosest overall alternativeOn the HorizonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%93#7c513d#774c37Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.