Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Chestnut Sculpt dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (47%)4.2 (339)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (22%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (72%)4.2 (2,863)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Rabanne Colorshot Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in 01 My Bad, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Chestnut Sculpt. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChestnut SculptClosest shade match01 My BadHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%83#643520#6b2f18Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Finish65%75SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Main Character, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Chestnut Sculpt. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChestnut SculptClosest overall alternativeMain CharacterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%76#643520#6c422dClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83Deep / darkDeep / darkSome differenceDepth difference 6.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Finish65%75SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$7 less (22%)
Sephora
