Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick Oyster Twilight dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.6 (517)·Nude · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than satin (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than satin (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 306 Golden Marshmallow, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Oyster Twilight. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOyster TwilightClosest shade match306 Golden MarshmallowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#c29183#c69888Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared68
Finish65%75SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay Naked Eyeshadow Stick in Blurred Out, against Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Oyster Twilight. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOyster TwilightClosest overall alternativeBlurred OutHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#c29183#ba9080Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Finish65%75SatinMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than satin
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
