Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25 CN 10 Alabaster dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.9 (4,681)·Light · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very fair, cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim colour stability· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for fair skin with rosy undertones
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$35.01 less (71%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Fair Beige, Very Fair Complexion with cool undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: vanilla - fair skin with pink undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25 CN 10 Alabaster (Light · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 1, against Clinique Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25 in CN 10 Alabaster. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 10 AlabasterClosest shade match1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#e0c0ab#dbbeacLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionVery fairVery fairBoth described as very fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 81/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Powder Foundation in Catania - Light 2, against Clinique Even Better Clinical Serum Foundation Broad Spectrum SPF 25 in CN 10 Alabaster. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 85/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$10 less (20%)
Target
Walmart
