Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (44%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$20.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (46%)4.3 (8,122)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as rich deep, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Described as rich deep, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich tan with soft peach undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as rich deep, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as deep · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with warm undertone and olive undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Described as light, yours as deep· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as deep · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light, neutral peach
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as deep· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light medium, yours as deep · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium, neutral golden
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light medium, yours as deep
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation CN 116 Spice (Medium · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Fenty Beauty Soft'Lit Naturally Luminous Hydrating Longwear Foundation in 290, against Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation in CN 116 Spice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 116 SpiceClosest match290How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%96#c49a70#c39c71Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $5 more
Target
