Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation WN 122 Clove dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.3 (6,833)·Tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability· Not marketed for normal/combination skin
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
33
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Deep shade with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark brown with neutral undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (67%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep skin with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan deep with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation WN 122 Clove (Tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
CoverGirl Olay Simply Ageless 3-in-1 Liquid Foundation in 270 Toasted Almond, against Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation in WN 122 Clove. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 122 CloveClosest shade match270 Toasted AlmondHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#ad7b57#ab7b54Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Hydra Glow Hydrating Foundation in 4Y70 - Warm Espresso, against Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation in WN 122 Clove. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared81
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
SephoraCosts $13 more
Ulta Beauty
