Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow Certified Platinum dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than silver· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Nebulous, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Certified Platinum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCertified PlatinumClosest shade matchNebulousHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#d2cdd1#c8c8ceVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 77/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L.A. Girl Prism Stick Eye & Face Jelly Stick in Diamond Dream, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Certified Platinum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCertified PlatinumClosest overall alternativeDiamond DreamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%66#d2cdd1#d5c6c2Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 82/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $19 more
Sephora
