Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow It's Glit dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling sunlit gold with silver reflects
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic amber gold with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 14 Solar, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in It's Glit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIt's GlitClosest shade match14 SolarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#e5c98f#f0c683Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall55
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 190 Extra, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in It's Glit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIt's GlitClosest overall alternative190 ExtraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%75#e5c98f#f0d68dClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSameDepth difference 6.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall75
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing14-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 14-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.