Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow Tan-talize dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Brown · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with silver, gold and copper sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: golden bronze with gold and copper sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Amber Lights, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Tan-talize. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan-talizeClosest shade matchAmber LightsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#bc906d#c28c64Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall65
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Super Shock Shadow in Glow Up, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Tan-talize. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan-talizeClosest overall alternativeGlow UpHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%64#bc906d#b98a75Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $3 more
Sephora
