Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow So Metal dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Differences: Bronze rather than taupe· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with silver, gold and copper sparkle
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than taupe · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
9
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Mushroom, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in So Metal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSo MetalClosest shade matchMushroomHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%76#af9680#bfa18aClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 6.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall28
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 61/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix Stix - Multi-Use Pearl Pigment Stick for Eye, Cheek & Lip in Duo #1 Mystic Taupe & Interstellar, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in So Metal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDry, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $22 more
