Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow Hypebiscus dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 27S peony, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Hypebiscus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHypebiscusClosest shade match27S peonyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c8837c#c1837eVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall60
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Rose Water, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Hypebiscus. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHypebiscusClosest overall alternativeRose WaterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#c8837c#c28685Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall75
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 85/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $27 more
