Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow Straight Fire dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Red · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than red· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than red· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: medium pink beige w/ silver micro glitter
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than red· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than red · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: brushed gold with silver shimmer
Differences: Grey rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than red
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than red· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than red · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than red· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Taupe rather than red· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
21
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than red · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Always On Your Mind, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Straight Fire. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStraight FireClosest matchAlways On Your MindHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%93#a08980#a4887eVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 65/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $19 more
