Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow Pop Off Pink dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·Pink · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: medium mauve w/ pink micro glitter
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in Pink Chocolate, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Pop Off Pink. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePop Off PinkClosest matchPink ChocolateHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#bd8890#c38c91Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.