Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow White Hot dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (12,000)·White · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Silver rather than white· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Ivory Bisque/Bronze Satin New, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in White Hot. Matched on the Ivory Bisque pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhite HotClosest shade matchIvory Bisque/Bronze Satin NewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#e5d1c5#e9d5caLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Super Shock Shadow in Mighty Morphn', against e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in White Hot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhite HotClosest overall alternativeMighty Morphn'How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%85#e5d1c5#f0ded2Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%84LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 91/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $18 more
