Eyeshadow Singles Blushing Lizard dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Taupe · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than taupe· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than taupe · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: golden metallic taupe with rich tawny shimmer/ holographic blushed gold with shifts of silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Silver rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Purple rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Purple rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Purple rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Purple rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Purple rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Purple rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format)
Retailer shade note: vibrant purple with silver, blue, violet and pink sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Viper, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Blushing Lizard. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushing LizardClosest matchViperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%73#b19ca9#b191a2Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 66/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.