Eyeshadow Singles Elvin Things dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Green · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Golden rather than green· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering golden marshmallow
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than green· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling sunlit gold with silver reflects
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than green · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than green· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than green · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in So Bright Now, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Elvin Things. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeElvin ThingsClosest shade matchSo Bright NowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#e4d6b7#edd9b9Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall48
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Overall match 72/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Sour Candy, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Elvin Things. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeElvin ThingsClosest overall alternativeSour CandyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%80#e4d6b7#d9cdb7Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $29 more
Sephora
