Eyeshadow Singles Glamourust dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling pink with multi-colored pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sacheu Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N in Shu-ggah, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Glamourust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlamourustClosest shade matchShu-ggahHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#c87c70#c47468Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared73
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Take Your Pink, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Glamourust. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlamourustClosest overall alternativeTake Your PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%95#c87c70#c27a6dLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 84/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
