Eyeshadow Singles Pixie Problems dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Sundaze, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Pixie Problems. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePixie ProblemsClosest matchSundazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%73#d5bae2#e2cbebClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.