Eyeshadow Singles Electric Butterfly dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: smoky steel metallic with gunmetal shimmer/
holographic opal foil with indigo & liliac sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (60%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than purple· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than purple · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 220 Mood Swing, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Electric Butterfly. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeElectric ButterflyClosest match220 Mood SwingHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#a29cc2#a69ec0Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Longevity50%40Not listed14-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$3 less (20%)
